Regulator orders since 2023 tied to US banks’ fintech, BaaS or third-party payment business, with their status.

This tracker lists sponsor-bank enforcement actions by the FDIC, the OCC and the Federal Reserve since March 2023: formal orders and agreements whose own text or announcement ties them to a bank’s fintech, banking-as-a-service, program-manager or third-party payment business. As of October 5, 2026 it holds 17 actions, 16 against banks and one against a bank holding company. Ten are in force and seven have been terminated.

Last checked: October 5, 2026. Refreshed weekly.

Orders in force

Bank Regulator Order Issued What it requires or restricts
Cross River Bank FDIC FDIC-22-0040b consent order Mar 8, 2023 FDIC non-objection before any new third-party lending partner or new credit product
Choice Financial Group FDIC, North Dakota FDIC-23-0086b consent order Dec 18, 2023 AML program covering customers onboarded through third parties; lookback of those customers
Lineage Bank FDIC FDIC-23-0041b consent order Jan 30, 2024 No new fintech partners until a formal onboarding process is in place; exit plans for major fintech partners
Sutton Bank FDIC, Ohio FDIC-23-0110b consent order Feb 1, 2024 Inventory of program managers’ AML duties; customer identification lookback for prepaid cards from July 2020
Piermont Bank FDIC FDIC-23-0038b consent order Feb 27, 2024 Review of data, systems and controls for every third-party relationship; board approval for new partners
Mode Eleven Bancorp (holding company of Summit National Bank) Federal Reserve 24-008-B-HC cease-and-desist order Mar 28, 2024 No expansion of its fintech business strategy without Reserve Bank approval; wind-down plan
Evolve Bank & Trust Federal Reserve, Arkansas 24-012-B-SM, 24-012-B-HC cease-and-desist order Jun 11, 2024 Supervisors’ prior approval for new fintech partners, program managers or products in its Open Banking Division
Green Dot Bank Federal Reserve 24-005-B-SM, 24-005-B-HC cease-and-desist order Jul 19, 2024 $44 million penalty; independent reviews of consumer compliance and AML for prepaid and tax refund services
FFB Bank FDIC, California FDIC-24-0112b consent order Jan 10, 2025 No new ISOs or sub-ISOs in its merchant services program until its ISO review plan is in place
Community Federal Savings Bank OCC AA-ENF-2025-21 consent order Apr 24, 2026 BSA/AML action plan for its payment processing line; independent lookback of suspicious activity

“In force” means the regulator had published no termination by October 5, 2026. The FDIC’s monthly releases name banks only from February 2025 onward, so for older FDIC orders we also searched the FDIC order database.

Terminated orders

Bank Regulator Order Issued Terminated
Metropolitan Commercial Bank Federal Reserve (NYDFS penalty separately) 23-018-B-SM cease-and-desist order and $14.5 million penalty Oct 16, 2023 Dec 4, 2025
First Fed Bank FDIC FDIC-23-0026b consent order Nov 21, 2023 Oct 23, 2024 (date from the bank’s SEC filing)
Blue Ridge Bank OCC AA-ENF-2023-68 consent order Jan 24, 2024 Nov 13, 2025 (AA-ENF-2025-58)
Thread Bank FDIC FDIC-24-0022b consent order May 21, 2024 Dec 22, 2025
Axiom Bank OCC AA-SO-2024-83 formal agreement Oct 3, 2024 Apr 29, 2026 (AA-SO-2026-26)
Patriot Bank OCC AA-NE-2025-05 formal agreement Jan 14, 2025 Jun 30, 2026 (AA-ENF-2026-34)
Hatch Bank FDIC (California parallel order) FDIC-24-0062b consent order Apr 3, 2025 Jan 21, 2026

What the orders have in common

  • Limits on growth. Seven of the 17 actions limit new partners or products without a regulator’s approval or until controls are fixed: Cross River, First Fed, Blue Ridge, Lineage, Mode Eleven Bancorp, Evolve and FFB. Five of those seven are still in force.
  • Third parties in the text. Every order in the tracker names third parties, fintech partners, program managers or independent sales organizations in its findings or requirements.
  • Lookbacks. Sutton, Choice, Axiom, Patriot and Community Federal Savings Bank were ordered to re-review past customers or transactions.

What is not in the tracker

Orders whose text does not tie them to fintech, BaaS, program-manager or third-party payment business are left out, even when the bank has fintech partners. For example, Lineage Bank’s second consent order, FDIC-26-0028b of June 24, 2026, covers capital, problem loans and brokered deposits and is listed on the Lineage Bank profile but not here. The inclusion rule is on the methodology page.